Kaynakça 

Abedi, J., Leon, S., & Kao, J. C. (2008). Examining differential distractor functioning in reading assessments for students with disabilities. CRESST Rept. No.743. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST). https://doi.org/10.1037/e642932011-001   

AERA, APA & NCME, (2014). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12045   

Alagumalai S. & Keeves JP. Distractors–can they be biased too? Journal of Outcome Measurement. 1999 ;3(1):89-102. PMID: 10063774. 

Banks, K. (2006). A comprehensive framework for evaluating hypotheses about cultural bias in educational testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 19(2), 115-132. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame1902_3   

Banks, K. (2009). Using DDF in a post hoc analysis to understand sources of DIF. Educational Assessment, 14(2), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627190903035229   

Barton, K. E., & Huynh, H. (2003). Patterns of errors made by students with disabilities on a reading test with oral reading administration. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(4), 602-614. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164403256363   

Brown, J. D. (1999). The relative importance of persons, items, subtests, and languages to TOEFL test variance. Language Testing, 16(2), 217–238. https://doi.org/10.1191/026553299674908889   

Camilli, G., & Shepard, L. A. (1994). Methods for identifying biased test items. (Vol. 4) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821409701800108   

Camilli, G. (2006). Test Fairness. In Brennan, R.L. (ed.), Educational Measurement (Fourth Edition) (syf. 221-256). 

Deng, J. (2020). The Relationship between Differential Distractor Functioning (DDF) and Differential Item Functioning (DIF): If DDF Occurs, Must DIF Occur? (Doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas). 

Dorans, N. J., & Holland, P. W. (1993). DIF detection and description: Mantel-Haenszel and standardization. In P. W. Holland & H. Wainer (Eds.), Differential item functioning (pp. 35–66). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169301700113   

Dorans, N. J., Schmitt, A. P., & Bleistein, C. A. (1992). The standardization approach to assessing comprehensive differential item functioning. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29(4), 309 – 319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1992.tb00379.x   

Ferguson, C. J. (2009). An Effect Size Primer: A Guide for Clinicians and Researchers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40(5), 532–538. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015808   

Green, B. F., Crone, C. R., & Folk, V. G. (1989). A method for studying differential distractor functioning. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26(2), 147– 160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1989.tb00325.x   

Hambleton, R., & Jirka, S. (2006). Anchor-based methods for judgmentally estimating item statistics. In S. Downing & T. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development (pp. 399– 420). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203874776.ch18   

Hasançebi, B., Terzi, Y., & Küçük, Z. (2020). Madde güçlük indeksi ve madde ayırt edicilik indeksine dayalı çeldirici analizi. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(1), 224-240. https://doi.org/10.17714/gumusfenbil.615465   

Jalili, T., Barati, H., & Moein Zadeh, A. (2020). Using multiple-variable matching to identify EFL ecological sources of differential item functioning. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 38(4), 1–42. 

Karami, H. (2011). Detecting gender bias in a language proficiency test. International Journal of Language Studies, 5(2), 27–38.  

Kato, K., Moen, R. E., & Thurlow, M. L. (2009). Differentials of a State reading assessment: item functioning, distractor functioning, and omission frequency for disability categories. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(2), 28 – 40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2009.00145.x   

Kim, M. (2001). Detecting DIF across the different language groups in a speaking test. Language Testing, 18(1), 89–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220101800104   

Middleton, K., & Laitusis, C. C. (2007). Examining test items for differential distractor functioning among students with learning disabilities. ETS Research Report Series, 2007(2), i-34. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2007.tb02085.x   

Moghadam, M., & Nasirzadeh, F. (2020). The application of Kunnan’s test fairness framework (TFF) on a reading comprehension test. Language Testing in Asia, 10(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-020-00105-2   

Pae, T. I. (2004). DIF for examinees with different academic backgrounds. Language testing, 21(1), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532204lt274oa   

Park, M., Wu, A.D. (2017). Investigating differential options functioning using multinomial logistic regression. Int. J. Quantitative Research in Education, Vol. 4, Nos. 1/2, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijqre.2017.086511   

Penfield, R. D. (2008). An odds ratio approach for assessing differential distractor functioning effects under the nominal response model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 45(3), 247 – 269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2008.00063.x   

Penfield, R. D. (2010). Modeling DIF effects using distractor-level invariance effects: Implications for understanding the causes of DIF. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34(3), 151-165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621609359284   

Schmitt, A. P., & Bleistein, C. A. (1987). Factors affecting differential item functioning for black examinees on Scholastic Aptitude Test analogy items (RR-87-23). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2330-8516.1987.tb00227.x   

Schmitt, A. P., & Dorans, N. J. (1990). Differential item functioning for minority examinees on the SAT. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 67-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1990.tb00735.x   

Suh, Y., & Bolt, D. M. (2011). A nested logit approach for investigating distractors as causes of differential item functioning. Journal of Educational Measurement, 48(2), 188-205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2011.00139.x   

Suh, Y., & Talley, A. E. (2015). An empirical comparison of DDF detection methods for understanding the causes of DIF in multiple-choice items. Applied Measurement in Education, 28(1), 48-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2014.973560   

Takala, S., & Kaftandjieva, F. (2000). Test fairness: A DIF analysis of an L2 vocabulary test. Language Testing, 17(3), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220001700303   

Terzi, R. & Yakar, L. (2018). Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 136-149. Seviye Belirleme Sınavında Değişen Madde ve Değişen Çeldirici Fonksiyonları Analizleri. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.368081   

Thissen, D., Steinberg, L., & Wainer, H. (1993). Detection of differential item functioning using the parameters of item response models. In P. W. Holland & H. Wainer (Eds.), Differential item functioning (pp. 67-113). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169301700113   

Tsaousis, I., Sideridis, G., & Al-Saawi, F. (2018). Differential Distractor Functioning as a Method for Explaining DIF: The Case of a National Admissions Test in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Testing, 18(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2017.1345914   

Veale, J., & Foreman, D. (1983). Assessing cultural bias using foil response data: Cultural variation. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20(3), 249-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1983.tb00203.x   

Walker, C. (2011). What’s the DIF? Why Differential Item Functioning Analyses Are an Important Part of Instrument Development and Validation. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(4) 364–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911406666   

Westers, P., & Kelderman, H. (1991). Examining differential item functioning due to item difficulty and alternative attractiveness. Psychometrika, 57(1), 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02294661   

Zumbo, B. D. (1999). A handbook on the theory and methods of differential item functioning (DIF). Ottawa: National Defense Headquarters. 

Zumbo, B. D. (2007). Three generations of DIF analyses: Considering where it has been, where it is now, and where it is going. Language assessment quarterly, 4(2), 223-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434300701375832