KAYNAKÇA

Anderson, R. C. (1972). How to construct achievement tests to assess comprehension. Review of Educational Research, 42, 145–170.

Bejar, I. I. (1993). A generative approach to psychological and educational measurement. In N. Frederikson, R. J. Mislevy, & I. I. Bejar (Eds.), Test theory for a new generation of tests (pp. 323–359). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Bloom, B. (1956). A taxonomy of cognitive objectives. New York: McKay. Bormuth, J. R. (1970). On a theory of achievement test items. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Coşkun, F., ve Gülleroğlu, H. D. (2021). Yapay zekânın tarih içindeki gelişimi ve eğitimde kullanılması. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), 54(3), 947-966.

Cronbach, L. J. (1970). Essentials of psychological testing.

Cronbach, L. J. ve Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.

Döring, A. K. (2005). Program evaluation: A facet-theoretic approach.

Drasgow, F., Luecht, R. M., & Bennett, R. (2006). Technology and testing. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 471–516). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

Ebel, R. L. (1951). Writing the test item. In E. F. Lindquist (Ed.), Educational measurement (1st ed., pp. 185–249). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

Embretson, S. E. (2002). Generating abstract reasoning items with cognitive theory. In S. H. Irvine, & P. C. Kyllonen (Eds.), Item generation for test development (pp. 219–250). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Gierl, M.J., & Lai, H. (2012). The role of item models in automatic item generation. International journal of testing, 12(3), 273-298.

Gierl, M. J., & Haladyna, T. M. (Eds.). (2012). Automatic item generation: Theory and practice. Routledge.

Gierl, M. J., Zhou, J., & Alves, C. (2008). Developing a taxonomy of item model types to promote assessment engineering. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 7(2). Retrieved from http://www.jtla.org.

Gutl, C., Lankmayr, K., Weinhofer, J., & Hofler, M. (2011). Enhanced Automatic Question Creator–EAQC: Concept, Development and Evaluation of an Automatic Test Item Creation Tool to Foster Modern e-Education. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 9(1), 23- 38.

Guttman, L. (1959). Introduction to facet design and analysis. Acta Psychologica, 15, 130-138. Haladyna, T. M. (2004). Developing and validating multiple-choice test items (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).

Haladyna, T. M. ve Downing, S. M. (1993). How many options is enough for a multiple-choice test item. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(4), 999–1010.

Haladyna, T. M., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2013). Developing and validating test items. Routledge.

Higgins, D. (2007). Item Distiller: Text retrieval for computer-assisted test item creation. Educational Testing Service Research Memorandum (RM-07-05). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Higgins, D., Futagi, Y., & Deane, P. (2005). Multilingual generalization of the ModelCreator software for math item generation. ETS Research Report Series, 2005(1), i-38.

Hill, P. (2012). The Book of Knowledge of Ingenious Mechanical Devices:(Kitāb fī ma’rifat al-ḥiyal al-handasiyya). Springer Science & Business Media.

Hively, W. (1974). Introduction to domain-referenced testing. Educational Technology, 14(6), 5–10.

Irvine, S. H. (2002). The foundations of item generation for mass testing. In S. H. Irvine & P. C. Kyllonen (Eds.), Item generation for test development (pp. 3–34). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Irvine, S. H., & Kyllonen, P. C. (Eds.) (2002). Item generation for test development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Kane, M. T. (2006a). Content-related validity evidence. In S. M. Downing & T. M. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development, pp. 131–154. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Kane, M. T. (2006b). Validation. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed.) pp. 17–64. Westport, CT: American Council on Education/Praeger

Merrill, M. D. (1994). Instructional design theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

Mislevy, R. (2006). Cognitive psychology and educational assessment. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp 257–305). Westport, CT: American Council on Education/Praeger.

Nitko, A. J. (1985). [Review of Roid and Haladyna’s A technology for test item writing]. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 201–204.

Osburn, H. G. (1968). Item sampling for achievement testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 28, 95–104.

Rodriguez, M. R. (2004). Three options are optimal for multiple-choice items: A meta-analysis of 80 years of research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 24(2) 3–13.

Roid, G. H. ve Haladyna, T. M. (1982). A technology for test-item writing. Academic Press.

Sayin, A., & Gierl, M. J. (2023). Automatic item generation for online measurement and evaluation: Turkish literature items. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 10(2), 218-231.

Singley, M.K., & Bennett, R.E. (2002). Item generation and beyond: Applications of schema theory to mathematics assessment. Generating Items for Cognitive Tests: Theory and Practice., Nov, 1998, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ, US; This chapter was presented at the aforementioned conference.,

Snow, R. E., & Lohman, D. F. (1989). Implications of cognitive psychology for educational measurement. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 263–332). New York: American Council on Education and Macmillan.

Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Abilities are forms of developing expertise. Educational Researcher, 27(3), 11–20.

Wesman, A. G. (1971). Writing the test item. In R. L. Thorndike (Ed.) Educational measurement (2nd ed., pp. 99–111). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.